The Center for Scientific Review publishes their Peer Review Notes three times a year, and the most recent issue came out yesterday. The news items are always interesting and it is worth subscribing, if you don’t already. This issue contained an item about things NIH reviewers should not say. I repeat the list in its […]
Top Ten Things NIH Reviewers Should NOT Say In A Review Read More »
Yesterday, NIH and AHRQ announced that they had changed its resubmission policy. While a given application is still allowed only one resubmission, if you are unsuccessful on the A1, you can then submit the application again as an A0 without having to substantially redesign the content and scope of the project. This “new submission” will
The End of Two Strikes You’re Out: Good or Bad News for Grant Applicants? Read More »
On December 7, the NIH Office of the Director issued a press release announcing a series of new initiates. The initiatives group under two main themes: workforce development and data & informatics. I strongly recommend that people read the one-page press release to get a sense of the way NIH will set priorities in terms
NIH Will Pilot Anonymous Peer Review of Grant Applications Read More »
